United States Code
11 U.S.C. § 545 — Statutory liens
Section 545 lets a bankruptcy trustee avoid certain statutory liens on a debtor's property. Paragraph (1) reaches liens that first become effective only when the debtor files, becomes insolvent, or hits a similar financial trigger. Paragraph (2) reaches liens not perfected or enforceable against a bona fide purchaser when the case begins. Paragraphs (3) and (4) reach liens for rent and liens of distress for rent. Avoidance runs only to the extent the lien fits one of those descriptions.
If a creditor has a lien on your property that you never signed for — one that arose because a statute says so — this is the section that decides whether the trustee can undo it. Section 545 lists four categories of statutory lien the trustee may avoid, and the categories turn on when the lien became effective and whether it was perfected when the case started. The text below is short, and each numbered paragraph is a separate route.
What does 11 U.S.C. § 545 actually let the trustee do?
The opening line carries most of the meaning: the trustee "may avoid the fixing of a statutory lien on property of the debtor to the extent that" the lien matches one of the four numbered paragraphs. Three words in that sentence do real work. It is the trustee who acts — the section names no other party. The word "may" grants a power rather than imposing a duty. And "to the extent that" ties avoidance to how far the lien fits a listed description, rather than framing it as automatically all-or-nothing. The four paragraphs are independent routes, and a lien need only fall within one: (1) liens that first become effective against the debtor when a financial event occurs, (2) liens not perfected or enforceable against a bona fide purchaser at the commencement of the case, (3) liens for rent, and (4) liens of distress for rent. Note also what is not here: the section does not define "statutory lien." That definition sits elsewhere in the Code, not in the text on this page.
Which liens does paragraph (1) reach, and why do the triggers matter?
Paragraph (1) covers a lien that "first becomes effective against the debtor" at one of six moments, listed as subparagraphs (A) through (F). They are: (A) when a case under this title concerning the debtor is commenced; (B) when an insolvency proceeding other than under this title is commenced; (C) when a custodian is appointed or authorized to take, or takes, possession; (D) when the debtor becomes insolvent; (E) when the debtor's financial condition fails to meet a specified standard; and (F) at the time of an execution against property of the debtor levied at the instance of an entity other than the holder of the statutory lien. The common thread the text draws is timing. Each trigger is a moment of financial distress or outside enforcement, and the paragraph asks whether the lien became effective against the debtor only at that moment. Subparagraph (F) is the one that does not turn on the debtor's own finances — it turns on someone other than the lienholder levying an execution.
What does the bona fide purchaser test in paragraph (2) mean?
Paragraph (2) reaches a lien that "is not perfected or enforceable at the time of the commencement of the case against a bona fide purchaser that purchases such property at the time of the commencement of the case." Two features of that phrasing matter to a reader trying to follow it. First, the clock is fixed to a single instant — the commencement of the case — for both the perfection question and the imagined purchase. Second, the paragraph adds "whether or not such a purchaser exists." The buyer is hypothetical. No one has to have made an offer, and no sale has to have been contemplated; the paragraph asks how the lien would stand up against a purchaser who bought at that moment. Because perfection rules for statutory liens generally come from outside the Bankruptcy Code, this paragraph points the analysis toward the law that created the lien. The text of § 545 itself does not state those perfection rules.
What is the tax exception written into paragraph (2)?
Paragraph (2) ends with a carve-out: the bona fide purchaser test does not apply "in any case in which a purchaser is a purchaser described in section 6323 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or in any other similar provision of State or local law." That is a cross-reference, and § 545 does not reproduce what section 6323 says. What the text on this page establishes is narrower: where the hypothetical purchaser is one that section 6323 describes — or one described by a comparable state or local provision — the exception applies rather than the general test in paragraph (2). Because section 6323 concerns federal tax liens, this is the clause a reader with a tax lien will want to look at, and it is also the point where the analysis leaves the Bankruptcy Code entirely. Paragraph (2) is the only one of the four paragraphs carrying this exception; the triggers in paragraph (1) and the rent categories in (3) and (4) are written without it.
Why does § 545 single out landlord liens for rent?
Paragraphs (3) and (4) are the shortest in the section and the easiest to read. A statutory lien that "is for rent" falls in paragraph (3). A "lien of distress for rent" falls in paragraph (4). Unlike paragraph (1), neither depends on when the lien became effective, and unlike paragraph (2), neither depends on perfection or on a hypothetical purchaser. The category itself is the test as the text states it. That is why these two paragraphs are worth checking first when a landlord asserts a lien that arose under a statute rather than under the lease. The section does not define "rent" or "distress," and it does not describe how such liens arise — those come from the state law that created them. What the text on this page does say is that a statutory lien falling into either category sits within the trustee's avoiding power under the opening sentence, to the extent stated there.
This summary is our plain-English explanation, written to help you find the right part of the text below. The section itself is the authority — where the two differ, the text controls.
Text of 11 U.S.C. § 545
Reproduced in full from the official source, verified as of July 2026. View it at the source.
The trustee may avoid the fixing of a statutory lien on property of the debtor to the extent that such lien—
(1) first becomes effective against the debtor—
(A) when a case under this title concerning the debtor is commenced;
(B) when an insolvency proceeding other than under this title concerning the debtor is commenced;
(C) when a custodian is appointed or authorized to take or takes possession;
(D) when the debtor becomes insolvent;
(E) when the debtor's financial condition fails to meet a specified standard; or
(F) at the time of an execution against property of the debtor levied at the instance of an entity other than the holder of such statutory lien;
(2) is not perfected or enforceable at the time of the commencement of the case against a bona fide purchaser that purchases such property at the time of the commencement of the case, whether or not such a purchaser exists, except in any case in which a purchaser is a purchaser described in section 6323 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or in any other similar provision of State or local law;
(3) is for rent; or
(4) is a lien of distress for rent.
(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2597; Pub. L. 98–353, title III, §460, July 10, 1984, 98 Stat. 377; Pub. L. 109–8, title VII, §711, Apr. 20, 2005, 119 Stat. 127.)
Notes and amendment history
Published by the official source alongside the section above. These notes record how the text has changed over time and the reasoning behind those changes. They are not the operative rule — the enacted text is the section itself.
Historical and Revision Notes
legislative statements
Section 545 of the House amendment modifies similar provisions contained in the House bill and Senate amendment to make clear that a statutory lien may be avoided under section 545 only to the extent the lien violates the perfection standards of section 545. Thus a Federal tax lien is invalid under section 545(2) with respect to property specified in sections 6323(b) and (c) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 [title 26]. As a result of this modification, section 545(b) of the Senate amendment is deleted as unnecessary.
Statutory liens: The House amendment retains the provision of section 545(2) of the House bill giving the trustee in a bankruptcy case the same power which a bona fide purchaser has to take over certain kinds of personal property despite the existence of a tax lien covering that property. The amendment thus retains present law, and deletes section 545(b) of the Senate amendment which would have no longer allowed the trustee to step into the shoes of a bona fide purchaser for this purpose.
senate report no. 95–989
This section permits the trustee to avoid the fixing of certain statutory liens. It is derived from subsections 67b and 67c of present law [section 107(b) and (c) of former title 11]. Liens that first become effective on the bankruptcy or insolvency of the debtor are voidable by the trustee. Liens that are not perfected or enforceable on the date of the petition against a bona fide purchaser are voidable. If a transferee is able to perfect under section 546(a) and that perfection relates back to an earlier date, then in spite of the filing of the bankruptcy petition, the trustee would not be able to defeat the lien, because the lien would be perfected and enforceable against a bona fide purchaser that purchased the property on the date of the filing of the petition. Finally, a lien for rent or of distress for rent is voidable, whether the lien is a statutory lien or a common law lien of distress for rent. See proposed 11 U.S.C. 101(37); Bankruptcy Act §67(c)(1)(C). The trustee may avoid a lien under this section even if the lien has been enforced by sale before the commencement of the case. To that extent, Bankruptcy Act §67c(5) is not followed.
Subsection (b) limits the trustee's power to avoid tax liens under Federal, state, or local law. For example, under §6323 of the Internal Revenue Code [Title 26]. Once public notice of a tax lien has been filed, the Government is generally entitled to priority over subsequent lienholders. However, certain purchasers who acquire an interest in certain specific kinds of personal property will take free of an existing filed tax lien attaching to such property. Among the specific kinds of personal property which a purchaser can acquire free of an existing tax lien (unless the buyer knows of the existence of the lien) are stocks and securities, motor vehicles, inventory, and certain household goods. Under the present Bankruptcy Act (§67(c)(1)) [section 107(c)(1) of former title 11], the trustee may be viewed as a bona fide purchaser, so that he can take over any such designated items free of tax liens even if the tax authority has perfected its lien. However, the reasons for enabling a bona fide purchaser to take these kinds of assets free of an unfiled tax lien, that is, to encourage free movement of these assets in general commerce, do not apply to a trustee in a title 11 case, who is not in the same position as an ordinary bona fide purchaser as to such property. The bill accordingly adds a new subsection (b) to sec. 545 providing, in effect, that a trustee in bankruptcy does not have the right under this section to take otherwise specially treated items of personal property free of a tax lien filed before the filing of the petition.
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Section 6323 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, referred to in par. (2), is classified to section 6323 of Title 26, Internal Revenue Code.
Amendments
**2005**—Par. (2). Pub. L. 109–8 inserted before semicolon at end ", except in any case in which a purchaser is a purchaser described in section 6323 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or in any other similar provision of State or local law".
**1984**—Par. (1)(A). Pub. L. 98–353, §460(1), struck out "is" after "is".
Par. (1)(C). Pub. L. 98–353, §460(2), substituted "appointed or authorized to take" for "apponted".
Par. (2). Pub. L. 98–353, §460(3), substituted "at the time of the commencement of the case" for "on the date of the filing of the petition" in two places.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 109–8 effective 180 days after Apr. 20, 2005, and not applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before such effective date, except as otherwise provided, see section 1501 of Pub. L. 109–8, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–353 effective with respect to cases filed 90 days after July 10, 1984, see section 552(a) of Pub. L. 98–353, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.
Guides that rely on 11 U.S.C. § 545
Plain-language explanations on this site that cite this section.
By Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq. · Florida Bar No. 21022
Last reviewed July 27, 2026 · Sources verified July 27, 2026 · How we verify
Every figure on this page is drawn from a primary legal source and checked against our canonical legal database before publication. Bankruptcy.law is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.
Turn this into a plan for your exact situation, state, and court.
See My Debt Relief Options→