Bankruptcy.lawBankruptcy.law

United States Code

11 U.S.C. § 106 — Waiver of sovereign immunity

Section 106 addresses when a governmental unit can be brought into a bankruptcy case despite sovereign immunity. Subsection (a) abrogates that immunity for a listed group of Bankruptcy Code sections and lets the court hear those issues and enter orders, including a money recovery but not punitive damages. Subsection (b) treats filing a proof of claim as a waiver for related claims. Subsection (c) allows certain claims to be offset.

Many people in bankruptcy owe money to a government body — a tax agency, a state licensing authority, a court, a benefits program — or believe a government body has done something the Bankruptcy Code forbids. Governments normally raise sovereign immunity to block being sued. Section 106 sets out the limited circumstances in which the Bankruptcy Code overrides that assertion, and the limits on what a bankruptcy court can do about it.

What does section 106 actually do about sovereign immunity?

Subsection (a) begins with the phrase "Notwithstanding an assertion of sovereign immunity." That wording is the whole mechanism: the governmental unit is still free to assert immunity, and the section overrides that assertion within stated boundaries. The override is expressly limited — immunity is abrogated "to the extent set forth in this section," not across the Bankruptcy Code as a whole. The section then does three separate things in three subsections. Subsection (a) abrogates immunity for a defined list of Code sections and describes what the court may hear, order, and enforce. Subsection (b) treats a governmental unit's own filing of a proof of claim as a waiver in specific circumstances. Subsection (c) permits an offset against a governmental unit's claim or interest. These are independent routes, and a situation that falls outside all three is not addressed by this section at all.

Which parts of the Bankruptcy Code does the abrogation cover?

Subsection (a)(1) does not abrogate immunity for the Bankruptcy Code generally. It sets out a specific, closed list of numbered sections, reproduced in full in the statutory text directly below this overview. The list is long and spans several chapters of the Code, but it is finite. The practical consequence is a threshold question rather than a general rule: identify the Code section that governs the dispute with the governmental unit, then check whether that number appears in the list in subsection (a)(1). If it does, subsection (a)(2) provides that the court may hear and determine any issue arising with respect to the application of those sections to governmental units. If it does not appear on the list, subsection (a) does not reach it, and the assertion of immunity is not overridden by that subsection. Read the list itself rather than relying on a summary of it — the exact numbers control.

Can a bankruptcy court order a government agency to pay money?

Subsection (a)(3) provides that the court may issue an order, process, or judgment against a governmental unit under the listed sections or under the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, and states that this includes an order or judgment awarding a money recovery. The same paragraph carves out one category expressly: it does not include an award of punitive damages. Costs and fees are treated separately again — an order or judgment for costs or fees under the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Rules must be consistent with the provisions and limitations of the title 28 standard identified in the text. Subsection (a)(4) then governs collection rather than entry of the judgment. Enforcement against a governmental unit must be consistent with the nonbankruptcy law that applies to that unit, and a money judgment against the United States is paid as if it were a judgment rendered by a United States district court. Entry and enforcement are distinct steps here.

Does section 106 create a new right to sue the government?

No. Subsection (a)(5) states directly that nothing in the section creates any substantive claim for relief or cause of action not otherwise existing under the Bankruptcy Code, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, or nonbankruptcy law. That paragraph draws the line between immunity and liability. Section 106 addresses whether a governmental unit can raise sovereign immunity to avoid a proceeding; it does not supply the underlying legal theory on which the governmental unit might be held responsible. Some other provision — inside the Bankruptcy Code, in the Rules, or in nonbankruptcy law — has to furnish that claim first. In practical terms, an argument built only on section 106 has no substantive content: it removes a defense, and something else must supply the claim. Whether such a claim exists in a particular situation is a legal question, and this is a common point to raise with an attorney.

What happens if a government agency files a proof of claim in my case?

Subsection (b) addresses a governmental unit that voluntarily comes into the case. A governmental unit that has filed a proof of claim is deemed to have waived sovereign immunity — but the waiver is bounded by three conditions stated in the text. It applies to a claim against that governmental unit; that claim must be property of the estate; and it must have arisen out of the same transaction or occurrence out of which the governmental unit's own claim arose. All three have to line up. A claim belonging to the estate that arises from an entirely separate transaction is not covered by subsection (b), even though the governmental unit filed a proof of claim in the case. Note also that this waiver operates independently of the list in subsection (a)(1) — it turns on the governmental unit's own filing and on the relationship between the two claims.

How does the offset in subsection (c) work?

Subsection (c) is the shortest provision in the section and operates without regard to whether the governmental unit asserts immunity. It provides that there shall be offset against a claim or interest of a governmental unit any claim against that governmental unit that is property of the estate. Two features distinguish it from subsection (b). First, it is not conditioned on the governmental unit having filed a proof of claim, and it contains no same-transaction requirement. Second, the text is framed as a directive — "there shall be offset" — rather than as a permission or a waiver. What it reaches is the netting of amounts against a claim or interest the governmental unit holds, and the claim being offset must be property of the estate. How subsection (c) interacts with subsections (a) and (b) in a particular case is a question courts consider on the specific facts.

This summary is our plain-English explanation, written to help you find the right part of the text below. The section itself is the authority — where the two differ, the text controls.

Text of 11 U.S.C. § 106

Reproduced in full from the official source, verified as of July 2026. View it at the source.

(a) Notwithstanding an assertion of sovereign immunity, sovereign immunity is abrogated as to a governmental unit to the extent set forth in this section with respect to the following:

(1) Sections 105, 106, 107, 108, 303, 346, 362, 363, 364, 365, 366, 502, 503, 505, 506, 510, 522, 523, 524, 525, 542, 543, 544, 545, 546, 547, 548, 549, 550, 551, 552, 553, 722, 724, 726, 744, 749, 764, 901, 922, 926, 928, 929, 944, 1107, 1141, 1142, 1143, 1146, 1201, 1203, 1205, 1206, 1227, 1231, 1301, 1303, 1305, and 1327 of this title.

(2) The court may hear and determine any issue arising with respect to the application of such sections to governmental units.

(3) The court may issue against a governmental unit an order, process, or judgment under such sections or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, including an order or judgment awarding a money recovery, but not including an award of punitive damages. Such order or judgment for costs or fees under this title or the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure against any governmental unit shall be consistent with the provisions and limitations of section 2412(d)(2)(A) of title 28.

(4) The enforcement of any such order, process, or judgment against any governmental unit shall be consistent with appropriate nonbankruptcy law applicable to such governmental unit and, in the case of a money judgment against the United States, shall be paid as if it is a judgment rendered by a district court of the United States.

(5) Nothing in this section shall create any substantive claim for relief or cause of action not otherwise existing under this title, the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, or nonbankruptcy law.

(b) A governmental unit that has filed a proof of claim in the case is deemed to have waived sovereign immunity with respect to a claim against such governmental unit that is property of the estate and that arose out of the same transaction or occurrence out of which the claim of such governmental unit arose.

(c) Notwithstanding any assertion of sovereign immunity by a governmental unit, there shall be offset against a claim or interest of a governmental unit any claim against such governmental unit that is property of the estate.

(Pub. L. 95–598, Nov. 6, 1978, 92 Stat. 2555; Pub. L. 103–394, title I, §113, Oct. 22, 1994, 108 Stat. 4117; Pub. L. 111–327, §2(a)(4), Dec. 22, 2010, 124 Stat. 3557.)

Notes and amendment history

Published by the official source alongside the section above. These notes record how the text has changed over time and the reasoning behind those changes. They are not the operative rule — the enacted text is the section itself.

Historical and Revision Notes

legislative statements

Section 106(c) relating to sovereign immunity is new. The provision indicates that the use of the term "creditor," "entity," or "governmental unit" in title 11 applies to governmental units notwithstanding any assertion of sovereign immunity and that an order of the court binds governmental units. The provision is included to comply with the requirement in case law that an express waiver of sovereign immunity is required in order to be effective. Section 106(c) codifies *In re Gwilliam*, 519 F.2d 407 (9th Cir., 1975), and *In re Dolard*, 519 F.2d 282 (9th Cir., 1975), permitting the bankruptcy court to determine the amount and dischargeability of tax liabilities owing by the debtor or the estate prior to or during a bankruptcy case whether or not the governmental unit to which such taxes are owed files a proof of claim. Except as provided in sections 106(a) and (b), subsection (c) is not limited to those issues, but permits the bankruptcy court to bind governmental units on other matters as well. For example, section 106(c) permits a trustee or debtor in possession to assert avoiding powers under title 11 against a governmental unit; contrary language in the House report to H.R. 8200 is thereby overruled.

senate report no. 95–989

Section 106 provides for a limited waiver of sovereign immunity in bankruptcy cases. Though Congress has the power to waive sovereign immunity for the Federal government completely in bankruptcy cases, the policy followed here is designed to achieve approximately the same result that would prevail outside of bankruptcy. Congress does not, however, have the power to waive sovereign immunity completely with respect to claims of a bankrupt estate against a State, though it may exercise its bankruptcy power through the supremacy clause to prevent or prohibit State action that is contrary to bankruptcy policy.

There is, however, a limited change from the result that would prevail in the absence of bankruptcy; the change is two-fold and is within Congress' power vis-a-vis both the Federal Government and the States. First, the filing of a proof of claim against the estate by a governmental unit is a waiver by that governmental unit of sovereign immunity with respect to compulsory counterclaims, as defined in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [title 28, appendix], that is, counterclaims arising out of the same transaction or occurrence. The governmental unit cannot receive a distribution from the estate without subjecting itself to any liability it has to the estate within the confines of a compulsory counterclaim rule. Any other result would be one-sided. The counterclaim by the estate against the governmental unit is without limit.

Second, the estate may offset against the allowed claim of a governmental unit, up to the amount of the governmental unit's claim, any claim that the debtor, and thus the estate, has against the governmental unit, without regard to whether the estate's claim arose out of the same transaction or occurrence as the government's claim. Under this provision, the setoff permitted is only to the extent of the governmental unit's claim. No affirmative recovery is permitted. Subsection (a) governs affirmative recovery.

Though this subsection creates a partial waiver of immunity when the governmental unit files a proof of claim, it does not waive immunity if the debtor or trustee, and not the governmental unit, files proof of a governmental unit's claim under proposed 11 U.S.C. 501(c).

This section does not confer sovereign immunity on any governmental unit that does not already have immunity. It simply recognizes any immunity that exists and prescribes the proper treatment of claims by and against that sovereign.

Editorial Notes

References in Text

The Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, referred to in subsec. (a)(3), (5), are set out in the Appendix to this title.

Amendments

**2010**—Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 111–327 struck out "728," after "726,".

**1994**—Pub. L. 103–394 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section read as follows:

"(a) A governmental unit is deemed to have waived sovereign immunity with respect to any claim against such governmental unit that is property of the estate and that arose out of the same transaction or occurrence out of which such governmental unit's claim arose.

"(b) There shall be offset against an allowed claim or interest of a governmental unit any claim against such governmental unit that is property of the estate.

"(c) Except as provided in subsections (a) and (b) of this section and notwithstanding any assertion of sovereign immunity—

"(1) a provision of this title that contains 'creditor', 'entity', or 'governmental unit' applies to governmental units; and

"(2) a determination by the court of an issue arising under such a provision binds governmental units."

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1994 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 103–394 effective Oct. 22, 1994, and applicable with respect to cases commenced under this title before, on, and after Oct. 22, 1994, see section 702(a), (b)(2)(B) of Pub. L. 103–394, set out as a note under section 101 of this title.

Guides that rely on 11 U.S.C. § 106

Plain-language explanations on this site that cite this section.

By Antonio G. Jimenez, Esq. · Florida Bar No. 21022

Last reviewed July 27, 2026 · Sources verified July 27, 2026 · How we verify

Every figure on this page is drawn from a primary legal source and checked against our canonical legal database before publication. Bankruptcy.law is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice.

Turn this into a plan for your exact situation, state, and court.

See My Debt Relief Options